Initial scaffold: Turborepo monorepo + design wiki
Turborepo (pnpm workspaces) with all dependencies pinned to latest mutually-compatible versions: turbo 2.9, TypeScript 6, Fastify 5, React 19, Vite 8, better-sqlite3 12 + Drizzle ORM 0.45. Layout: - apps/server Fastify backend (local JWT auth + role guard, /health) - apps/web React 19 + Vite 8 operator SPA - packages/db Drizzle schema on SQLite/WAL; append-only events + users - packages/devices reader/printer/relay adapter interfaces (intent-only relay) - packages/shared shared domain types Architecture constraints from the design wiki are encoded in the scaffold: append-only hash-chained + signed event log, device-agnostic adapters, "a barrier is not a door" (relay expresses intent only), fully-local offline-first auth. wiki/ is an LLM-maintained Obsidian knowledge base (28 pages) ingested from the architecture & design notes, with its own maintenance schema. Verified: pnpm install, full turbo build (5/5), server boots and serves /health, drizzle-kit generates the initial migration.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
tags: [parking, stack, database]
|
||||
sources: [parking-system-architecture]
|
||||
updated: 2026-06-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# SQLite
|
||||
|
||||
The local database (`better-sqlite3` driver, accessed via [[drizzle-orm]]). The right call
|
||||
for a **single-site, single-writer** system. (See [[parking-system-architecture]] §2, §4.)
|
||||
|
||||
## Why it fits
|
||||
|
||||
Its only practical limit is **write concurrency** — one writer at a time, mitigated by **WAL
|
||||
mode** (many concurrent readers + one writer). A parking workload never approaches this.
|
||||
Other official limits are far beyond reach: ~281 TB max DB size, effectively unlimited rows,
|
||||
32,767 columns/table, 1 GB per text/blob cell.
|
||||
|
||||
You'd only outgrow SQLite with multiple machines writing the same DB (**never do this over a
|
||||
network share**) or sustained high-frequency concurrent writes — neither applies here.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relation to PostgreSQL
|
||||
|
||||
The move to remote PostgreSQL is a **business/durability** decision (the remote sync target),
|
||||
**not a capacity** one. [[drizzle-orm]] schemas port over with minimal change.
|
||||
|
||||
Open risk: a disk failure currently means total revenue-history loss — see
|
||||
[[open-questions]] #5 (durability/backup). Part of the [[technology-stack]].
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user