docs(wiki): close the session's loose threads — bay printer question, vocabulary-in-code decision, training note, guard family, OQ #16 settled
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FWncR69HgGPuei1dLrW3cU
This commit is contained in:
@@ -324,6 +324,16 @@ manifest (Car Wash → `carwash`; a future Bar → `bar`). Rules:
|
||||
- **The wash till prints on its own printer (2026-09-06).** Printer role `wash-desk`; the
|
||||
wash till's Z-report and vouchers go there, falling back to the booth printer — see
|
||||
[[printer-roles-failover]].
|
||||
- **Is a desk printer required? (user, 2026-09-06)** No, in either policy. With *Pagesa në
|
||||
kabinë* the wash till takes no money at all — orders ride the parking ticket, the booth
|
||||
prints the receipt and the booth Z carries the wash line — so the wash shift is offered but
|
||||
reconciles nothing (a desk printer would sit idle). With *Pagesa në lavazh* the till's Z and
|
||||
vouchers exist and prefer the desk printer, but fall back to the booth's; printing is
|
||||
best-effort, the signed event is the record. Where a desk printer becomes genuinely
|
||||
required is a piece that does not exist: a **customer receipt at bay payment** (today the
|
||||
customer gets nothing on paper). If built, it prints on the desk only, no fallback, and
|
||||
Setup should warn when the policy is bay payment with no `wash-desk` printer. Also open:
|
||||
hiding the wash till section on the desk when the policy is booth payment.
|
||||
|
||||
## Where the fraud control actually lives
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user