Files
parking_solution/wiki/concepts/append-only-event-chain.md
T
julian 7db5cfa0e4 Dingtian: close password-less string-protocol relay-fire hole
The string protocol (UDP 60001) has no password field but can fire relays
("11" = relay 1 on), bypassing relay_pw entirely. Proven on hardware: an
unauthenticated packet opened a relay. harden() had left it enabled "for
status reads".

- #status() now reads via the authenticated binary command (relay cmd 0x00)
  instead of the string protocol, so the string protocol is no longer needed.
- harden() disables the string protocol (udp2.p=255). BEST-EFFORT: firmware
  V3.6J's config API silently refuses to disable udp2 (the device web UI can),
  so it's not part of the blocking verify -- harden() re-checks and returns a
  warning instead of throwing. After a web-UI disable, the attack is dead and
  binary control/status still work (verified on hardware).
- HardenResult gains an optional `warnings[]`; the assign route surfaces them
  to the admin and logs them.
- Corrected the false comment claiming relay_pw stops an attacker (it is
  defence-in-depth on plaintext UDP, not a boundary).
- Thread localAddress through the driver's UDP/HTTP calls so a multi-homed
  host sources device traffic from the device-facing NIC.
- Device web login (webUser/webPassword) is no longer redacted from setup
  state -- it's an operational credential for the admin-only device area;
  pushPassword/relayPassword stay machine-only.

Wiki: document the vuln + fix, the firmware caveat, and the out-of-band
actuation gap (the log captures host actions only; reconciliation vs. an
independent witness is the real control and is not yet built).
2026-06-15 11:29:55 +02:00

5.2 KiB

type, tags, sources, updated
type tags sources updated
concept
parking
security
integrity
parking-system-architecture
2026-06-14

Append-Only Event Chain

The core integrity mechanism against operator fraud (see threat-model). (See parking-system-architecture §3.)

Three layered properties:

  1. Append-only event model. Entry/exit events are never edited or deleted, only appended. A "void" is itself a recorded event, not an erasure.
  2. Tamper-evident chaining. Each event stores the hash of the previous event (a hash chain). Reordering or deleting breaks the chain visibly.
  3. Hardware-backed signing. The atecc608 secure element signs each event with a non-extractable key. This is what makes the chain unforgeable rather than merely self-consistent — someone who owns the machine still cannot forge a valid entry.

It only becomes trustworthy as an external fraud control when paired with reconciliation against an authority the operator can't alter. Every device event — including those ingested from the uhppote-controller via event-log-ingestion — should land in this host-side chain.

Implementation (apps/server)

Implementation-derived. The schema (packages/db events) and types (packages/shared ParkingEvent) predate this; the writer/signer are new.

  • EventLog (apps/server/src/event-log.ts) is the append primitive. append() reads the latest row, sets index = prev + 1, prevHash = sha256(canonical(prev)) (genesis = null), signs the canonical form, and inserts. There are no update/delete paths.
  • Serialized appends. SQLite is single-writer, but read-prev → compute-hash → insert is multi-step, so EventLog also guards it with an in-process async lock — otherwise two near- simultaneous events could claim the same index or chain off a stale prevHash. Verified: 5 concurrent appends produced indices 1..5 with an intact chain.
  • Canonical form is a fixed-order JSON array (index,type,direction,lane,source,identity, occurredAt,prevHash) — byte-stable, since the chain + signatures depend on it. The volatile row id is excluded; chain identity is index + content.
  • verifyChain() walks oldest→newest, recomputing hashes + signatures. Catches tampered content (bad signature), reordering / a deleted row (index gap), and a prevHash mismatch. Exposed at GET /api/events/verify (admin). Read access to the log: GET /api/events.

The Signer abstraction (software now, ATECC608 later)

Signing goes through a Signer interface (packages/shared) — the abstraction over the atecc608. Because the chip being wired is still open-questions, the server ships a SoftwareSigner (HMAC-SHA256, key from EVENT_SIGNING_KEY). Swapping to the secure element is a new Signer impl with no EventLog change; each event stores its keyId so old events stay verifiable.

⚠️ The software signer makes the chain self-consistent + tamper-evident, but not unforgeable by someone who owns the host — only the ATECC608's non-extractable key gives property (3) above. Until the chip is wired, the chain detects tampering by outsiders and accidental corruption, but an operator with the signing key + DB access could re-sign a forged chain. This is the central reason #6 matters.

What currently feeds the log

Dingtian input (button) pushes → bus → input_received events (see device-input-flow, dingtian-relay). These are recorded faithfully as raw inputs, not as vehicle_entry — the richer entry event waits for the entry flow (ticket print + barrier command). Device→lane mapping is still a TODO (logged with lane: 0).

⚠️ Limitation: the log captures HOST-ORIGINATED actions only

The event log records what the host did (inputs it received, opens it commanded). It is blind to out-of-band relay actuation — anything that fires a relay without going through the host. Proven on hardware: a binary relay command sent directly to the device with the (sniffable) relay_pw fired a relay and produced zero events. Out-of-band paths include:

  • the password-less string protocol (until disabled — see dingtian-relay),
  • a sniffed/replayed relay_pw binary command (plaintext UDP — relay control is defence-in-depth, not a boundary),
  • the device's own ip_watchdog (auto-toggles a relay on ping-failure — must stay disabled),
  • a future barrier_open_command path is host-side and would log; these bypass it.

So the log alone does not detect operator/attacker fraud at the relay. That is by design — the actual control is reconciliation: compare the host's signed commanded opens against an independent witness of opens that physically happened (a door/loop sensor on a Dingtian input → which DOES push + log; the lpr-camera; payment/Z-report). A physical open with no matching signed command is the fraud signal. Both the witness sources and the reconciliation logic are NOT yet built — this is the main open gap. Prevention (VLAN isolation so the attacker can't reach UDP 60000) is the necessary first line; detection-via-reconciliation is the backstop.