parking_solution/wiki/concepts/validation-sponsorship.md

type, tags, sources, updated, status

type	tags	sources	updated	status
concept	parking domain business pricing validation design	parksql2017-legacy-schema	2026-06-17	open

Validation & Sponsorship — merchant comps, coupons, postpaid B2B

Builds on validation-discounts (the signed-event discount mechanism) to add the layer it leaves open: a sponsor account and postpaid B2B billing. The driving case — a nearby business with a postpaid agreement whose customers enter and exit freely, billed to the business monthly.

This page owns the sponsor/account/settlement model and the permit-vs-validation distinction. The how a discount is applied mechanics (signed event, due = max(0, fee − discounts), attribution, anti-abuse) live in validation-discounts — not duplicated here. Status: design, not built.

Why this is NOT a permit (the key distinction)

	permit	Validation / sponsorship
Subject	Known in advance; carries a credential (card/QR/plate)	Anonymous walk-in; identified only by the ticket they were issued
When applied	At entry (credential opens the lane)	After entry, against an existing session — at a pay station, by a code, or by a sponsor rule
Who pays	The subscriber, out-of-band	A third party (merchant/sponsor), or nobody (comp)
Model fit	permits + credentials	New: a validation event on a session + a sponsor account

A permit bypasses tariff computation; a validation adjusts the computed fee (or zeroes it). They compose — but they are different primitives.

Two economic models (both real)

• Prepaid — merchant buys a pool of value up front (legacy BA_Cupons: printed single-use codes worth DiscMinutes; City Center research: merchant pre-buys time tickets 15 min→all-day). Reconciliation = count used codes against the pool.
• Postpaid (the asked-for case) — merchant signs an agreement; their customers park free or discounted; the system accrues each validation against a sponsor balance and invoices monthly (City Center: "billed for the number of tickets validated each month," verified 3-0). No money moves at the lane.

The legacy system did only prepaid coupons — the postpaid sponsor account is net-new for this project.

Modifier types (extends validation-discounts)

The discount-type enum lives in validation-discounts; legacy DiscType (smallint) and research (Amano McGann / HUB J4M, abstained-not-refuted) confirm the set: comp / percent / fixed / time-credit (legacy DiscMinutes) / rate-switch. Sponsorship adds one field to a validation: a sponsorId. Full-comp + a sponsor = the "free entry/exit, bill the business" case.

The sponsor-liability consequence (anti-fraud)

The validation is a signed event (validation-discounts, append-only-event-chain); what sponsorship adds is that free-to-the-parker is not free-to-the-ledger — it is a receivable from the sponsor. Under the threat-model model:

• A postpaid sponsor's "enter/exit freely" still mints signed entry + exit events (and snapshots) — the audit trail is identical to a paying car; only the settlement target differs.
• The sponsor's period liability = the sum of sponsorId-tagged validation events over the period — derivable from the chain, reconcilable like a shift and visible to reconciliation (a sponsor comping far more than plausible footfall is an anomaly).

Proposed data shape (illustrative — design only)

sponsors          id, name, contact, mode {prepaid|postpaid},
                  balance_minor (prepaid pool / postpaid accrual), billing_period, active
validations       id, session_id, sponsor_id?, type, amount_minor|minutes,
                  code?, operator_id, created_at   // append-only; one row per application
(coupons)         code, value_minutes|minor, single_use, used_at?   // prepaid pool, optional

• A postpaid sponsor: each full-comp validation appends a row and accrues amount to the sponsor; monthly invoice = sum over the period; exit is free at the lane.
• Free entry/exit "freely": either the sponsor issues credentials (then it's closer to a permit — pick that path), or customers take a normal ticket and a sponsor rule / merchant code comps it at exit. The agreement wording decides which; both are expressible.

Reconciliation & settlement

• Prepaid: pool decrements; alert at low balance; no invoice.
• Postpaid: accrue; monthly statement per sponsor (legacy/City Center cadence ~the 10th). Statement lines trace to signed validation events → disputes resolvable against the chain.

Open

• "Enter/exit freely" mechanism: sponsor-issued credentials (permit-like) vs. ticket + comp-at-exit. Likely offer both; confirm the operator's actual deal shape.
• Prepaid coupon format: printed codes (legacy) vs. QR vs. merchant web-validation portal.
• Who may apply a validation, and the per-operator cap (a comp is a fraud vector — bound it and always sign it).
• Invoicing: in-app statement only, or export for external billing? FX if sponsor bills in another currency (defer to tariff FX).
• Partial-stay sponsorship (merchant covers first 2h, parker pays the rest) — time-credit or rate-switch covers it; confirm.